Question 1:
Why were people dissatisfied with British rule in the 1870s and 1880s?
Answer: Some of the reasons for dissatisfaction with British rule in
the 1870s and 1880s are as follows:
- The Arms Act was passed in
1878. This Act disallowed Indians from possessing arms.
- The Vernacular Press Act was
passed in 1878. This Act empowered the government to confiscate the assets
of newspapers including their printing presses, if the newspaper published
anything “objectionable”.
- The government tried to
introduce the Ilbert Bill in 1883. The bill made provisions for trial of
British or European persons by Indians. Thus, the Ilbert Bill sought
equality between British and Indian judges in the country. But the whites
opposed the Bill and forced the government to withdraw it.
·
Question 2: Who did the
Indian National Congress wish to speak for?
·
Answer: In spite of being a body of the educated elite, the Congress
also talked about the common people.
·
Answer: The First World War changed the economic and political
situation in India. There was a sharp price rise which increased the problems
of the common people.
·
The business groups reaped huge profits because the war increased
the demand for all kinds of goods. Reduced imports meant that the new demand
was being met by the Indian business houses.
·
Answer: In the 1940, the Muslim League moved a resolution to demand
“Independent States” for the Muslims in the north-western and eastern areas of
the country.
Question 5: Who were the Moderates? How did they propose
to struggle against British rule?
Answer: In its first twenty years, the Congress was “moderate” in
its objectives and methods. The Congress leaders of this period were called the
Moderates. During this period, the main demand of Congress was about getting a
greater voice for Indians in the government and administration.
Question
6: How was the politics of the Radicals within the Congress different from that
of the Moderates?
Answer: They criticized the Moderates for their “policy of prayers”.
They argued that people should not believe on the so called good intentions of
the government and must fight for swaraj. They wanted to explore radical
methods to ensure freedom.
Question
7: Discuss the various forms that the Non-Cooperation Movement took in different
parts of India. How did the people understand Gandhiji?
Answer: The Non-Cooperation Movement remained non-violent at most of
the places. But some people interpreted the message of Mahatma Gandhi in their
own ways; mostly to suit their local grievances.
- The
Patidar peasants of Kheda (Gujarat) organized non-violent campaigns
against the high land revenue demand.
- Liquor
shops were picketed in coastal Andhra and interior Tamil Nadu.
- The
tribals and poor peasants in Guntur district (Andhra Pradesh) staged a
number of forest satyagrahas; to protest against the new forest laws.
- The
Khilafat-Non-Cooperation Movement gave enormous support in Sind and
Bengal.
- In
Punjab, the Akali agitation of the Sikhs demanded to remove the corrupt
mahants from gurdwaras.
- In
Assam, the tea garden labourers demanded a big hike in their wages. They
shouted the slogan, “Gandhi Maharaj ki jai”. In many folk songs of Assam;
Gandhiji was referred to as “Gandhi Raja”.
Question 8: Why did Gandhiji choose to break the salt law?
Answer: Mahatma Gandhi and other nationalist leaders argued that salt was an essential item of our food and hence it was wrong to impose a tax on salt. Moreover, the issue of salt affected all; the rich and poor; alike. Hence, Gandhiji choose to break the salt law.
Answer: After the 1937 provincial elections, Congress refused to form a coalition government with the League in United Provinces. This irked the League leaders. The Muslim League passed a resolution in 1940 to demand independent states for the Muslims in the north-west and eastern India. The Cabinet Mission came to Delhi in 1946. Its aim was suggesting some framework for the independent nation. It suggested loose confederation and some degree of autonomy for the Muslim-majority areas. But negotiations between the Congress and the League failed. After that, Muslim League persisted with its demand for Pakistan. Large scale violence occurred throughout the northern part of the peninsula. The country was finally partitioned in August 1947.
No comments:
Post a Comment